Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RWMHX
LBWAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$22.73
Change-$0.21 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.26M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.73
Change-$0.95 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
LBWAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LBWAX (95.3M). LBWAX (1.36) and RWMHX (1.33) have matching dividends . LBWAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. LBWAX (0.31). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.83 vs. LBWAX (36.44).
| LBWAX | RWMHX | LBWAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.41 | 280% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.41 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.643 | 11.375 | 129% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.33 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.31 | 5.16 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.78 | 32.41 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.44 | 46.83 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement