Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RWEBX
LBWAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$21.94
Change-$0.34 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LBWAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LBWAX (101M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBWAX (1.39) vs RWEBX (0.78). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). LBWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.98 vs. RWEBX (4.66). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. LBWAX (22.22).
| LBWAX | RWEBX | LBWAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.06 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.06 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.329 | 1.452 | 367% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.78 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 4.66 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.98 | 27.48 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.22 | 33.53 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.29 | 91.10 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement