Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFEX
LBWAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$21.94
Change-$0.34 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.55
Change-$1.72 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LBWAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWAX (101M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWAX: RMFEX (1.50) vs LBWAX (1.39). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. LBWAX (5.98). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. LBWAX (22.22).
| LBWAX | RMFEX | LBWAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.62 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.329 | 2.280 | 234% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.50 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 7.80 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.98 | 29.96 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.22 | 46.45 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.29 | 114.19 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement