Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$21.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.39M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWAX (97.4M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWAX (1.31) vs RMFCX (1.18). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. LBWAX (4.15). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. LBWAX (22.13).
| LBWAX | RMFCX | LBWAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.447 | 9.696 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.18 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.15 | 8.05 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.17 | 28.89 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.13 | 46.17 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.67 | 91.60 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement