Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMFCX
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$21.94
Change-$0.34 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LBWAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWAX (101M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWAX (1.39) vs RMFCX (1.24). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. LBWAX (5.98). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. LBWAX (22.22).
| LBWAX | RMFCX | LBWAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.329 | 2.244 | 237% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.24 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 7.45 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.98 | 28.73 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.22 | 44.16 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.29 | 105.79 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement