Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWAX vs RMEBX
LBWAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWAX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value A
Price$21.94
Change-$0.34 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LBWAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWAX (101M). LBWAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBWAX (1.39) vs RMEBX (1.08). LBWAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWAX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBWAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. LBWAX (5.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. LBWAX (22.22).
| LBWAX | RMEBX | LBWAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.07 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.329 | 2.231 | 239% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.08 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.98 | 7.30 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.98 | 28.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.22 | 43.15 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.29 | 103.95 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement