LBTSF
Price
$13.36
Change
+$4.35 (+48.28%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.01B
LVRLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
18.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBTSF vs LVRLF

Header iconLBTSF vs LVRLF Comparison
Open Charts LBTSF vs LVRLFBanner chart's image
Almirall SA
Price$13.36
Change+$4.35 (+48.28%)
Volume$332
Capitalization2.01B
CordovaCann
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.62K
Capitalization18.62M
LBTSF vs LVRLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LBTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBTSF vs. LVRLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBTSF is a Hold and LVRLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LBTSF: $13.36 vs. LVRLF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: LBTSF and LVRLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBTSF: 237% vs. LVRLF: 50%
Market capitalization -- LBTSF: $2.01B vs. LVRLF: $18.62M
LBTSF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $2.01B. LVRLF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $18.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBTSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLVRLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LBTSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LVRLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBTSF is a better buy in the long-term than LVRLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBTSF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVRLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBTSF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LVRLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBTSF is a better buy in the short-term than LVRLF.

Price Growth

LBTSF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LVRLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -6.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+2.02% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBTSF($2.01B) has a higher market cap than LVRLF($18.6M). LBTSF YTD gains are higher at: 45.645 vs. LVRLF (-6.000). LBTSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 150M vs. LVRLF (-2.57M). LBTSF has more cash in the bank: 447M vs. LVRLF (746K). LVRLF has less debt than LBTSF: LVRLF (5.81M) vs LBTSF (398M). LBTSF has higher revenues than LVRLF: LBTSF (893M) vs LVRLF (4.45M).
LBTSFLVRLFLBTSF / LVRLF
Capitalization2.01B18.6M10,823%
EBITDA150M-2.57M-5,836%
Gain YTD45.645-6.000-761%
P/E Ratio49.75N/A-
Revenue893M4.45M20,090%
Total Cash447M746K59,920%
Total Debt398M5.81M6,848%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBTSF vs LVRLF: Fundamental Ratings
LBTSF
LVRLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
88100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3694
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LBTSF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVRLF (98). This means that LBTSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

LBTSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that LBTSF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

LBTSF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that LBTSF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

LBTSF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVRLF (94). This means that LBTSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

LBTSF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as LVRLF (100). This means that LBTSF’s stock grew similarly to LVRLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBTSFLVRLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LVRLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDSCX30.680.30
+0.99%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr I
VLISX600.075.18
+0.87%
Vanguard Large Cap Index Institutional
IBGIX26.190.18
+0.69%
VY® Baron Growth I
GVIRX17.760.10
+0.57%
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium Inv
EVDIX21.57-0.04
-0.19%
Camelot Event Driven Institutional

LBTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBTSF and IPSEY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBTSF and IPSEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBTSF
1D Price
Change %
LBTSF100%
N/A
IPSEY - LBTSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEDXF - LBTSF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
LVRLF - LBTSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-8.29%
MKGAF - LBTSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
KSPHF - LBTSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LVRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVRLF and MCUJF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVRLF and MCUJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVRLF
1D Price
Change %
LVRLF100%
-8.29%
MCUJF - LVRLF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEDIF - LVRLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
KHTRF - LVRLF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.50%
KSPHF - LVRLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LBTSF - LVRLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More