LBSR
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.88M
SLI
Price
$3.07
Change
+$0.20 (+6.97%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
627.65M
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBSR vs SLI

Header iconLBSR vs SLI Comparison
Open Charts LBSR vs SLIBanner chart's image
Liberty Star Uranium & Metals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$328.87K
Capitalization3.88M
Standard Lithium
Price$3.07
Change+$0.20 (+6.97%)
Volume$2.41M
Capitalization627.65M
LBSR vs SLI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LBSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBSR vs. SLI commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSR is a Hold and SLI is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LBSR: $0.05 vs. SLI: $3.07)
Brand notoriety: LBSR and SLI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBSR: 152% vs. SLI: 115%
Market capitalization -- LBSR: $3.88M vs. SLI: $627.65M
LBSR [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.88M. SLI’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $627.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBSR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LBSR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLI is a better buy in the long-term than LBSR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBSR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBSR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SLI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLI is a better buy in the short-term than LBSR.

Price Growth

LBSR (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -14.64% price change this week, while SLI (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLI is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLI($628M) has a higher market cap than LBSR($3.89M). LBSR has higher P/E ratio than SLI: LBSR (5.50) vs SLI (5.04). SLI YTD gains are higher at: 110.274 vs. LBSR (-50.000). SLI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. LBSR (1.76M). SLI has more cash in the bank: 33.8M vs. LBSR (67.9K). SLI has less debt than LBSR: SLI (334K) vs LBSR (753K). LBSR (0) and SLI (0) have equivalent revenues.
LBSRSLILBSR / SLI
Capitalization3.89M628M1%
EBITDA1.76M137M1%
Gain YTD-50.000110.274-45%
P/E Ratio5.505.04109%
Revenue00-
Total Cash67.9K33.8M0%
Total Debt753K334K225%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBSR vs SLI: Fundamental Ratings
LBSR
SLI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
10017
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLI's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBSR (88). This means that SLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

SLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as LBSR (100). This means that SLI’s stock grew similarly to LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

SLI's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBSR (100). This means that SLI’s stock grew significantly faster than LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

SLI's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBSR (94). This means that SLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

SLI's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as LBSR (14). This means that SLI’s stock grew similarly to LBSR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBSRSLI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSAT31.230.54
+1.76%
Globalstar Inc
MVST2.560.03
+1.19%
Microvast Holdings
FICO1531.9913.07
+0.86%
Fair Isaac Corp
EXFY1.920.01
+0.52%
Expensify
EDSA2.53N/A
N/A
Edesa Biotech

LBSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBSR and CTXDF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBSR and CTXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBSR
1D Price
Change %
LBSR100%
+0.73%
CTXDF - LBSR
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
EDDYF - LBSR
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMMCF - LBSR
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLI - LBSR
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.97%
NMG - LBSR
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
More

SLI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLI has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLI jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLI
1D Price
Change %
SLI100%
+6.97%
LAC - SLI
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
TECK - SLI
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
SGML - SLI
41%
Loosely correlated
+6.46%
VALE - SLI
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
RIO - SLI
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More