Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$35.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.77B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBSCX (45.8B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFEX (1.43) vs LBSCX (0.70). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (16.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). LBSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. RMFEX (8.21). LBSCX (48.44) and RMFEX (48.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFEX | LBSCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.398 | 9.983 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 112B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.43 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | 8.21 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.81 | 29.84 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.44 | 48.39 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.97 | 97.98 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers