Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFEX
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$32.84
Change-$0.31 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.75B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$57.86
Change-$0.45 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LBSCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LBSCX (42.8B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFEX (1.58) vs LBSCX (0.77). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. LBSCX (6.34). RMFEX (62.32) and LBSCX (61.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFEX | LBSCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.62 | 266% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.660 | 6.152 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.8B | 106B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.58 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 9.03 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.84 | 29.63 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.14 | 62.32 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.35 | 76.27 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement