Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$34.02
Change+$0.22 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.84B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBSCX (43.8B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.27) vs LBSCX (0.76). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. LBSCX (9.28). LBSCX return over 5 years is better than : 65.27 vs. RMFCX (61.83).
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.621 | 9.596 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.8B | 109B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.27 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.28 | 11.47 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.00 | 29.27 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.27 | 61.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.41 | 79.21 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers