Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSCX vs RMFCX
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBSCX vs RMFCX
Columbia Dividend Income C
Price$32.84
Change-$0.31 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.36B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LBSCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LBSCX (42.4B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBSCX: RMFCX (1.31) vs LBSCX (0.77). LBSCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBSCX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBSCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSCX (14.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBSCX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. LBSCX (6.34). LBSCX (61.14) and RMFCX (59.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LBSCX | RMFCX | LBSCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.91 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.660 | 6.021 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 106B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.77 | 1.31 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 8.70 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.84 | 28.43 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.14 | 59.85 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.35 | 69.75 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement