Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMFEX
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$36.86
Change-$0.41 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.19B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LBSAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBSAX (45.2B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBSAX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LBSAX (1.38). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBSAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMFEX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. LBSAX (6.46). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.99 vs. RMFEX (57.30).
| LBSAX | RMFEX | LBSAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.317 | 15.396 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.2B | 112B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.46 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.46 | 7.02 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 31.78 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.99 | 57.30 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.59 | 101.84 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers