Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMEBX
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$36.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.55B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBSAX (44.5B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBSAX (1.38) vs RMEBX (1.09). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LBSAX (0.90). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. LBSAX (7.18). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.12 vs. RMEBX (55.29).
| LBSAX | RMEBX | LBSAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.025 | 11.308 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.5B | 109B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.09 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.18 | 7.57 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.02 | 31.59 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.12 | 55.29 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.21 | 89.40 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement