It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LBRDA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLBRDB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LBRDA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBRDB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
LBRDA (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +5.39% price change this week, while LBRDB (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.
LBRDA is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
LBRDA | LBRDB | LBRDA / LBRDB | |
Capitalization | 8.84B | 8.84B | 100% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -12.161 | 28.571 | -43% |
P/E Ratio | 8.07 | 12.13 | 67% |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 3.88B | 3.88B | 100% |
LBRDA | LBRDB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LBRDA's Valuation (83) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBRDB (87) in the null industry. This means that LBRDA’s stock grew similarly to LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBRDB (100) in the null industry. This means that LBRDA’s stock grew similarly to LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDA's SMR Rating (94) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBRDB (94) in the null industry. This means that LBRDA’s stock grew similarly to LBRDB’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LBRDA (65) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LBRDB’s stock grew similarly to LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDB's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBRDA (84) in the Specialty Telecommunications industry. This means that LBRDB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBRDA’s over the last 12 months.
LBRDA | LBRDB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago40% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago51% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago55% | 3 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago41% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago50% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago58% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago64% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 4 days ago39% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago47% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
LLYX | 12.08 | 0.60 | +5.23% |
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long LLY ETF | |||
REMX | 58.30 | 1.51 | +2.66% |
VanEck Rare Earth & Strat Mtls ETF | |||
DFIC | 32.26 | 0.17 | +0.53% |
Dimensional International Core Eq 2 ETF | |||
FHYS | 23.24 | N/A | -0.01% |
Federated Hermes Short Duration HY ETF | |||
MJ | 30.16 | -2.66 | -8.10% |
Amplify Alternative Harvest ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDA has been closely correlated with LBRDK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBRDA jumps, then LBRDK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LBRDA | 100% | +2.10% | ||
LBRDK - LBRDA | 75% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
CHTR - LBRDA | 72% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
CMCSA - LBRDA | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
LBRDB - LBRDA | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
ATUS - LBRDA | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBRDB has been loosely correlated with LBRDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LBRDB jumps, then LBRDA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBRDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LBRDB | 100% | N/A | ||
LBRDA - LBRDB | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
LBRDK - LBRDB | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.29% | ||
CABO - LBRDB | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.34% | ||
MTNOY - LBRDB | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
KDDIF - LBRDB | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |