Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBO vs XLF
LBO vs XLF Comparison
Open Charts LBO vs XLF
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Priv Eq ETF
Price$29.93
Change+$0.21 (+0.71%)
Volume$200
Net Assets7.62M
State Street®FinSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$54.37
Change+$0.22 (+0.41%)
Volume$346.11K
Net Assets53.75B
LBO vs XLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBO vs. XLF commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBO is a Hold and XLF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLF has more net assets: 53.8B vs. LBO (7.62M). LBO has a higher annual dividend yield than XLF: LBO (2.968) vs XLF (-1.132). LBO was incepted earlier than XLF: LBO (2 years) vs XLF (27 years). XLF (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than LBO (6.71). LBO has a higher turnover XLF (6.00) vs XLF (6.00).
| LBO | XLF | LBO / XLF | |
| Gain YTD | 2.968 | -1.132 | -262% |
| Net Assets | 7.62M | 53.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.71 | 0.08 | 8,388% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 6.00 | 183% |
| Yield | 6.80 | 1.31 | 518% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LBO | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBO and SAR have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBO and SAR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBO | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| SAR - LBO | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
| CODI - LBO | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.06% | ||
| GCMG - LBO | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| FDUS - LBO | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| PX - LBO | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
More | ||||
XLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLF has been closely correlated with JPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLF jumps, then JPM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y