Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBO vs TAN
LBO vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts LBO vs TAN
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Priv Eq ETF
Price$31.40
Change+$0.30 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.91M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$38.73
Change+$1.69 (+4.56%)
Volume$1.96M
Net Assets680.62M
LBO vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBO vs. TAN commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBO is a Hold and TAN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 681M vs. LBO (6.91M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than LBO: TAN (16.938) vs LBO (-2.710). LBO was incepted earlier than TAN: LBO (2 years) vs TAN (17 years). TAN (0.71) has a lower expense ratio than LBO (7.30). TAN has a higher turnover LBO (11.00) vs LBO (11.00).
| LBO | TAN | LBO / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | -2.710 | 16.938 | -16% |
| Net Assets | 6.91M | 681M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 7.30 | 0.71 | 1,028% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 43.00 | 26% |
| Yield | 6.67 | 0.48 | 1,386% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LBO | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +4.56% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 78% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 77% Closely correlated | +8.51% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 75% Closely correlated | +16.69% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 73% Closely correlated | +16.80% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | +3.91% | ||
More | ||||