Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBO vs TAN
LBO vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts LBO vs TAN
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Priv Eq ETF
Price$30.15
Change-$0.09 (-0.30%)
Volume$250
Net Assets9.06M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$43.40
Change-$0.31 (-0.71%)
Volume$14.7K
Net Assets784.43M
LBO vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBO vs. TAN commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBO is a Hold and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 784M vs. LBO (9.06M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than LBO: TAN (31.039) vs LBO (-5.402). LBO was incepted earlier than TAN: LBO (2 years) vs TAN (17 years). TAN (0.71) has a lower expense ratio than LBO (6.71). TAN has a higher turnover LBO (11.00) vs LBO (11.00).
| LBO | TAN | LBO / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | -5.402 | 31.039 | -17% |
| Net Assets | 9.06M | 784M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.71 | 0.71 | 945% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 43.00 | 26% |
| Yield | 6.45 | 0.40 | 1,627% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LBO | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 15 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBO and SCM have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBO and SCM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBO | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| SCM - LBO | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| TSLX - LBO | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| ARCC - LBO | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| HTGC - LBO | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| BCSF - LBO | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with FSLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then FSLR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | +4.01% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | +4.44% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 68% Closely correlated | -1.62% | ||
More | ||||