Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBO vs TAN
LBO vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts LBO vs TAN
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Priv Eq ETF
Price$27.80
Change+$0.09 (+0.32%)
Volume$835
Net Assets9.42M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$46.56
Change-$1.47 (-3.06%)
Volume$1.28M
Net Assets885.33M
LBO vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBO vs. TAN commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBO is a Hold and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 885M vs. LBO (9.42M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than LBO: TAN (40.580) vs LBO (-11.744). LBO was incepted earlier than TAN: LBO (2 years) vs TAN (18 years). TAN (0.71) has a lower expense ratio than LBO (6.71). TAN has a higher turnover LBO (11.00) vs LBO (11.00).
| LBO | TAN | LBO / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | -11.744 | 40.580 | -29% |
| Net Assets | 9.42M | 885M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.71 | 0.71 | 945% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 43.00 | 26% |
| Yield | 6.89 | 0.38 | 1,821% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LBO | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBO and CODI have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBO and CODI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBO | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| CODI - LBO | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| TPG - LBO | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| BCSF - LBO | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| BBDC - LBO | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| TCPC - LBO | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with FSLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then FSLR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -3.06% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 76% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | -6.71% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 74% Closely correlated | -7.70% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 71% Closely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 69% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
More | ||||