Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBO vs TAN
LBO vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts LBO vs TAN
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Priv Eq ETF
Price$25.89
Change-$0.95 (-3.54%)
Volume$2.4K
Net Assets6.87M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$56.01
Change-$2.09 (-3.60%)
Volume$1.64K
Net Assets1.47B
LBO vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBO vs. TAN commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBO is a Hold and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 1.47B vs. LBO (6.87M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than LBO: TAN (18.282) vs LBO (-7.017). LBO was incepted earlier than TAN: LBO (2 years) vs TAN (18 years). TAN (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than LBO (6.71). TAN has a higher turnover LBO (11.00) vs LBO (11.00).
| LBO | TAN | LBO / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | -7.017 | 18.282 | -38% |
| Net Assets | 6.87M | 1.47B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.71 | 0.70 | 959% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 41.00 | 27% |
| Yield | 7.23 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LBO | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBO and OWL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBO and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBO | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| OWL - LBO | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| FSK - LBO | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| GBDC - LBO | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
| BCSF - LBO | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.04% | ||
| NMFC - LBO | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +4.52% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 76% Closely correlated | +3.19% | ||
| NXT - TAN | 71% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 70% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 69% Closely correlated | +38.60% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 66% Loosely correlated | +12.24% | ||
More | ||||