NMFC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LBO | NMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 23% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 23% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 77% | 22 days ago 35% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 36% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBO and OWL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBO and OWL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBO | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| OWL - LBO | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| FSK - LBO | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| GBDC - LBO | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
| BCSF - LBO | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.04% | ||
| NMFC - LBO | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||