Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBISX vs RMFCX
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBISX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value IS
Price$21.02
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.39M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBISX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBISX (97.4M). LBISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBISX (1.65) vs RMFCX (1.18). LBISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBISX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LBISX (0.76). LBISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBISX: RMFCX (250) vs LBISX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. LBISX (3.80). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. LBISX (23.74).
| LBISX | RMFCX | LBISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.097 | 9.696 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.18 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 8.05 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.77 | 28.89 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.74 | 46.17 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.06 | 91.60 | 38% |