Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBISX vs RMFCX
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBISX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value IS
Price$22.29
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.99M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LBISX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBISX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBISX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LBISX (94M). LBISX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBISX (1.69) vs RMFCX (1.20). LBISX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBISX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LBISX (0.76). LBISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBISX: RMFCX (250) vs LBISX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. LBISX (-1.01). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. LBISX (40.28).
| LBISX | RMFCX | LBISX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.91 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.394 | 13.689 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.20 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.01 | 4.96 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.80 | 38.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.28 | 57.10 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.63 | 91.18 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement