LBGUF
Price
$45.79
Change
+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.46B
NMFC
Price
$10.30
Change
-$0.06 (-0.58%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.1B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBGUF vs NMFC

Header iconLBGUF vs NMFC Comparison
Open Charts LBGUF vs NMFCBanner chart's image
LE Lundbergfoeretagen AB
Price$45.79
Change+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.46B
New Mountain Finance
Price$10.30
Change-$0.06 (-0.58%)
Volume$427.98K
Capitalization1.1B
LBGUF vs NMFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBGUF vs. NMFC commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBGUF is a Hold and NMFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (LBGUF: $45.79 vs. NMFC: $10.30)
Brand notoriety: LBGUF and NMFC are both not notable
LBGUF represents the Industrial Conglomerates, while NMFC is part of the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBGUF: 100% vs. NMFC: 97%
Market capitalization -- LBGUF: $12.46B vs. NMFC: $1.1B
LBGUF [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $12.46B. NMFC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $137.63B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $13.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LBGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMFC is a better buy in the long-term than LBGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NMFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NMFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

LBGUF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NMFC (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.27%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.13% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBGUF($12.5B) has a higher market cap than NMFC($1.1B). LBGUF has higher P/E ratio than NMFC: LBGUF (20.98) vs NMFC (13.55). NMFC YTD gains are higher at: -2.888 vs. LBGUF (-13.775). NMFC has less debt than LBGUF: NMFC (1.78B) vs LBGUF (20.6B).
LBGUFNMFCLBGUF / NMFC
Capitalization12.5B1.1B1,141%
EBITDA11.2BN/A-
Gain YTD-13.775-2.888477%
P/E Ratio20.9813.55155%
Revenue31.7BN/A-
Total Cash1.28BN/A-
Total Debt20.6B1.78B1,155%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBGUF vs NMFC: Fundamental Ratings
LBGUF
NMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4754
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8922
SMR RATING
1..100
9741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5874
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1928
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMFC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBGUF (37). This means that NMFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBGUF (89). This means that NMFC’s stock grew significantly faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

NMFC's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBGUF (97). This means that NMFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

LBGUF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (74). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

LBGUF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (28). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBGUFNMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIDIX13.590.08
+0.59%
Principal International EQ Index Instl
LADQX20.82N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R2
VIOAX9.84N/A
N/A
VELA Income Opportunities A
PJFPX75.55-0.04
-0.05%
PGIM Jennison Growth R4
VVSCX12.05-0.10
-0.82%
VALIC Company I Small Cap Value

LBGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBGUF and CION have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBGUF and CION's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBGUF
1D Price
Change %
LBGUF100%
N/A
CION - LBGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
BX - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
NMFC - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
AMDUF - LBGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPUF - LBGUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-0.58%
OBDC - NMFC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
BCSF - NMFC
75%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
BXSL - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
TSLX - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
MFIC - NMFC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
More