LBGUF
Price
$45.79
Change
+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
10.92B
MGPUF
Price
$3.35
Change
-$0.20 (-5.63%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBGUF vs MGPUF

Header iconLBGUF vs MGPUF Comparison
Open Charts LBGUF vs MGPUFBanner chart's image
LE Lundbergfoeretagen AB
Price$45.79
Change+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization10.92B
M&G
Price$3.35
Change-$0.20 (-5.63%)
Volume$17.41K
Capitalization6.09B
LBGUF vs MGPUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBGUF vs. MGPUF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBGUF is a Hold and MGPUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LBGUF: $45.79 vs. MGPUF: $3.35)
Brand notoriety: LBGUF and MGPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBGUF: 100% vs. MGPUF: 542%
Market capitalization -- LBGUF: $10.92B vs. MGPUF: $6.09B
LBGUF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $10.92B. MGPUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LBGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGPUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the long-term than LBGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGPUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

LBGUF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGPUF (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBGUF($10.9B) has a higher market cap than MGPUF($6.09B). MGPUF has higher P/E ratio than LBGUF: MGPUF (71.94) vs LBGUF (16.81). MGPUF YTD gains are higher at: 33.466 vs. LBGUF (-13.775). MGPUF has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. LBGUF (2.79B). MGPUF has less debt than LBGUF: MGPUF (7.96B) vs LBGUF (20.8B). LBGUF has higher revenues than MGPUF: LBGUF (32.6B) vs MGPUF (-8.72B).
LBGUFMGPUFLBGUF / MGPUF
Capitalization10.9B6.09B179%
EBITDA13.5BN/A-
Gain YTD-13.77533.466-41%
P/E Ratio16.8171.9423%
Revenue32.6B-8.72B-374%
Total Cash2.79B4.88B57%
Total Debt20.8B7.96B261%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBGUF: Fundamental Ratings
LBGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBGUFMGPUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFY119.231.06
+0.90%
SoFi Select 500 ETF
SOYB22.250.14
+0.63%
Teucrium Soybean Fund
FIDI23.460.08
+0.36%
Fidelity International High Div ETF
VFLO35.770.10
+0.28%
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
LIAF175.29N/A
N/A
LifeX 2051 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF

LBGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBGUF and CION have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBGUF and CION's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBGUF
1D Price
Change %
LBGUF100%
N/A
CION - LBGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
BX - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
NMFC - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - LBGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPUF - LBGUF
14%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
More

MGPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPUF and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPUF and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPUF
1D Price
Change %
MGPUF100%
-5.63%
SRXXF - MGPUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBUC - MGPUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
LBGUF - MGPUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
LGGNF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More