LBGUF
Price
$45.79
Change
+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.54B
MGPUF
Price
$3.70
Change
+$0.10 (+2.78%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBGUF vs MGPUF

Header iconLBGUF vs MGPUF Comparison
Open Charts LBGUF vs MGPUFBanner chart's image
LE Lundbergfoeretagen AB
Price$45.79
Change+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.54B
M&G
Price$3.70
Change+$0.10 (+2.78%)
Volume$495
Capitalization8.3B
LBGUF vs MGPUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBGUF vs. MGPUF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBGUF is a Hold and MGPUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LBGUF: $45.79 vs. MGPUF: $3.70)
Brand notoriety: LBGUF and MGPUF are both not notable
LBGUF represents the Industrial Conglomerates, while MGPUF is part of the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBGUF: 100% vs. MGPUF: 8%
Market capitalization -- LBGUF: $12.54B vs. MGPUF: $8.3B
LBGUF [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $12.54B. MGPUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $8.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $136.03B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $14.1B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGPUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LBGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGPUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPUF is a better buy in the long-term than LBGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGPUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

LBGUF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGPUF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (-0.57% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBGUF($12.5B) has a higher market cap than MGPUF($8.3B). MGPUF has higher P/E ratio than LBGUF: MGPUF (31.78) vs LBGUF (21.07). MGPUF YTD gains are higher at: 47.251 vs. LBGUF (-13.775). MGPUF has more cash in the bank: 4.84B vs. LBGUF (1.28B). MGPUF has less debt than LBGUF: MGPUF (6.91B) vs LBGUF (20.6B). LBGUF has higher revenues than MGPUF: LBGUF (31.7B) vs MGPUF (11.3B).
LBGUFMGPUFLBGUF / MGPUF
Capitalization12.5B8.3B151%
EBITDA11.2BN/A-
Gain YTD-13.77547.251-29%
P/E Ratio21.0731.7866%
Revenue31.7B11.3B281%
Total Cash1.28B4.84B26%
Total Debt20.6B6.91B298%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBGUF vs MGPUF: Fundamental Ratings
LBGUF
MGPUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGPUF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (37). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBGUF (100). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (98). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (59). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPUF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (20). This means that MGPUF’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBGUFMGPUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRTR30.280.10
+0.33%
iShares LifePath Retirement ETF
CPSR24.66N/A
-0.01%
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March
VIS290.16-0.52
-0.18%
Vanguard Industrials ETF
LRGC74.79-0.20
-0.27%
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
QLV70.69-0.24
-0.33%
FlexShares US Quality Low Vol ETF

LBGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBGUF and CION have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBGUF and CION's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBGUF
1D Price
Change %
LBGUF100%
N/A
CION - LBGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
BX - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
NMFC - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
AMDUF - LBGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPUF - LBGUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPUF and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPUF and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPUF
1D Price
Change %
MGPUF100%
N/A
SRXXF - MGPUF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBUC - MGPUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
LBGUF - MGPUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
LGGNF - MGPUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More