LBGUF
Price
$45.79
Change
+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.68B
MGHCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBGUF vs MGHCF

Header iconLBGUF vs MGHCF Comparison
Open Charts LBGUF vs MGHCFBanner chart's image
LE Lundbergfoeretagen AB
Price$45.79
Change+$1.58 (+3.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.68B
MINCO CAP
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.63K
Capitalization1.87M
LBGUF vs MGHCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBGUF vs. MGHCF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBGUF is a Hold and MGHCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LBGUF: $45.79 vs. MGHCF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: LBGUF and MGHCF are both not notable
LBGUF represents the Industrial Conglomerates, while MGHCF is part of the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBGUF: 100% vs. MGHCF: 137%
Market capitalization -- LBGUF: $12.68B vs. MGHCF: $1.87M
LBGUF [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $12.68B. MGHCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $132.18B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $14.08B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBGUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGHCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LBGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGHCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LBGUF is a better buy in the long-term than MGHCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGHCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGHCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LBGUF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGHCF (@Investment Managers) price change was -11.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.40%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (-1.16% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LBGUF($12.7B) has a higher market cap than MGHCF($1.87M). LBGUF has higher P/E ratio than MGHCF: LBGUF (21.07) vs MGHCF (5.96). MGHCF YTD gains are higher at: 20.678 vs. LBGUF (-13.775). LBGUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.4B vs. MGHCF (630K). LBGUF has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. MGHCF (5.97M). MGHCF has less debt than LBGUF: MGHCF (128K) vs LBGUF (20.6B). LBGUF has higher revenues than MGHCF: LBGUF (31.4B) vs MGHCF (-566.11K).
LBGUFMGHCFLBGUF / MGHCF
Capitalization12.7B1.87M679,508%
EBITDA13.4B630K2,126,984%
Gain YTD-13.77520.678-67%
P/E Ratio21.075.96353%
Revenue31.4B-566.11K-5,546,586%
Total Cash1.28B5.97M21,387%
Total Debt20.6B128K16,093,750%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBGUF vs MGHCF: Fundamental Ratings
LBGUF
MGHCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9870
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1843
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LBGUF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGHCF (91). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

LBGUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (100). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (98). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

MGHCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as LBGUF (59). This means that MGHCF’s stock grew similarly to LBGUF’s over the last 12 months.

LBGUF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as MGHCF (43). This means that LBGUF’s stock grew similarly to MGHCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBGUFMGHCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGHCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNFI31.621.43
+4.74%
United Natural Foods
COKE115.391.46
+1.28%
Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc
CCLDO21.400.10
+0.47%
CareCloud
IMXI14.210.01
+0.07%
International Money Express
ARTV2.96-0.05
-1.66%
Artiva Biotherapeutics Inc

LBGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBGUF and CION have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBGUF and CION's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBGUF
1D Price
Change %
LBGUF100%
N/A
CION - LBGUF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
BX - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
NMFC - LBGUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
AMDUF - LBGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGPUF - LBGUF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGHCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGHCF and ONEXF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGHCF and ONEXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGHCF
1D Price
Change %
MGHCF100%
+11.72%
ONEXF - MGHCF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
MNGPF - MGHCF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGPHF - MGHCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
LGGNY - MGHCF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
LBGUF - MGHCF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More