Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RWMHX
LBDRX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.17
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.99M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.64
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
LBDRX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. LBDRX (94M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LBDRX (1.16). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LBDRX (0) vs RWMHX (250). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. LBDRX (-1.60). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.64 vs. LBDRX (35.85).
| LBDRX | RWMHX | LBDRX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.41 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.41 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.850 | 9.663 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 206B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | 3.99 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 41.40 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.85 | 49.64 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.49 | N/A | - |