Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RWMHX
LBDRX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.85
Change-$0.37 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LBDRX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LBDRX (101M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: LBDRX (1.45) vs RWMHX (1.36). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LBDRX (0) vs RWMHX (250). LBDRX (5.66) and RWMHX (5.40) have marching annual gain over last year. RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. LBDRX (20.72).
| LBDRX | RWMHX | LBDRX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.41 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.41 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.352 | 1.523 | 351% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.36 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 5.40 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.98 | 30.10 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.72 | 37.20 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.19 | 96.94 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement