Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RWMHX
LBDRX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.67
Change-$0.21 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.26M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.73
Change-$0.95 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
LBDRX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LBDRX (95.3M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LBDRX (1.17). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LBDRX (0) vs RWMHX (250). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. LBDRX (-0.94). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.83 vs. LBDRX (33.50).
| LBDRX | RWMHX | LBDRX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.41 | 341% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.41 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.350 | 11.375 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.94 | 5.16 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.23 | 32.41 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.50 | 46.83 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement