Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RWEBX
LBDRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.17
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.99M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
LBDRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. LBDRX (94M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBDRX (1.16) vs RWEBX (0.76). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. LBDRX (-1.60). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. LBDRX (35.85).
| LBDRX | RWEBX | LBDRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.06 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.06 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.850 | 9.079 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 206B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.76 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | 3.29 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 38.78 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.85 | 45.88 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.49 | 73.45 | 40% |