Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RWEBX
LBDRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.85
Change-$0.37 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LBDRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LBDRX (101M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBDRX (1.45) vs RWEBX (0.78). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LBDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.66 vs. RWEBX (4.66). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. LBDRX (20.72).
| LBDRX | RWEBX | LBDRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.06 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.06 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.352 | 1.452 | 368% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.78 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 4.66 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.98 | 27.48 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.72 | 33.53 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.19 | 91.10 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement