Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFEX
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.67
Change-$0.21 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.26M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBDRX (95.3M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LBDRX (1.17). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.84 vs. LBDRX (-0.94). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.52 vs. LBDRX (33.50).
| LBDRX | RMFEX | LBDRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.62 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.62 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.350 | 14.089 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.46 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.94 | 5.84 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.23 | 31.20 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.50 | 55.52 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.33 | 96.76 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement