Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFEX
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.17
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.99M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LBDRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LBDRX (94M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LBDRX (1.16). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. LBDRX (-1.60). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. LBDRX (35.85).
| LBDRX | RMFEX | LBDRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.62 | 226% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.62 | 245% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.850 | 13.941 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.46 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | 5.28 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 40.09 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.85 | 59.52 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.49 | 98.84 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement