Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFCX
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.39M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBDRX (97.4M). RMFCX (1.18) and LBDRX (1.13) have matching dividends . LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. LBDRX (3.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. LBDRX (20.51).
| LBDRX | RMFCX | LBDRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.91 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.050 | 9.696 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.18 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.75 | 8.05 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.08 | 28.89 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.51 | 46.17 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.90 | 91.60 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement