Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFCX
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.48
Change+$0.20 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.06M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LBDRX (97.1M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBDRX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LBDRX (1.17). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. LBDRX (3.22). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. LBDRX (45.95).
| LBDRX | RMFCX | LBDRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.91 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.400 | 13.245 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.24 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.22 | 6.41 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.02 | 42.10 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.95 | 63.20 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.27 | 103.62 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers