Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFCX
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.85
Change-$0.37 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBDRX (101M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBDRX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.24). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. LBDRX (5.66). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. LBDRX (20.72).
| LBDRX | RMFCX | LBDRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.91 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.352 | 2.244 | 238% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.24 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 7.45 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.98 | 28.73 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.72 | 44.16 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.19 | 105.79 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement