Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMFCX
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.67
Change-$0.21 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.26M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LBDRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBDRX (95.3M). RMFCX (1.21) and LBDRX (1.17) have matching dividends . LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LBDRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. LBDRX (0.06). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. LBDRX (34.74).
| LBDRX | RMFCX | LBDRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.91 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.400 | 15.093 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.06 | 6.67 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.91 | 30.56 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | 54.90 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.35 | 94.04 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement