Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMEBX
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.85
Change-$0.37 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBDRX (101M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBDRX (1.45) vs RMEBX (1.08). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. LBDRX (5.66). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. LBDRX (20.72).
| LBDRX | RMEBX | LBDRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.07 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.352 | 2.231 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.08 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 7.30 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.98 | 28.21 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.72 | 43.15 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.19 | 103.95 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement