Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMEBX
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.39M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBDRX (97.4M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBDRX (1.13) vs RMEBX (1.03). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.97 vs. LBDRX (3.75). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. LBDRX (20.51).
| LBDRX | RMEBX | LBDRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.07 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.050 | 9.599 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.03 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.75 | 7.97 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.08 | 28.41 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.51 | 45.21 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.90 | 90.05 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement