Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMEBX
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$22.17
Change+$0.11 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.99M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LBDRX (94M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBDRX (1.16) vs RMEBX (1.05). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. LBDRX (-1.60). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.95 vs. LBDRX (35.85).
| LBDRX | RMEBX | LBDRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.07 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.850 | 13.527 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.05 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.60 | 4.81 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.40 | 38.19 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.85 | 55.95 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.49 | 89.36 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement