LBCMF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.67M
LMEFF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
83.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LBCMF vs LMEFF

Header iconLBCMF vs LMEFF Comparison
Open Charts LBCMF vs LMEFFBanner chart's image
Copper Giant Res
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$109.38K
Capitalization3.67M
Laurion Mineral Exploration
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.1K
Capitalization83.36M
LBCMF vs LMEFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LBCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMEFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LBCMF vs. LMEFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBCMF is a Hold and LMEFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LBCMF: $0.15 vs. LMEFF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: LBCMF and LMEFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LBCMF: 155% vs. LMEFF: 34%
Market capitalization -- LBCMF: $3.67M vs. LMEFF: $83.36M
LBCMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.67M. LMEFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $83.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LBCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMEFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LBCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMEFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LMEFF is a better buy in the long-term than LBCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LBCMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMEFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LBCMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LMEFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LBCMF is a better buy in the short-term than LMEFF.

Price Growth

LBCMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while LMEFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LMEFF($83.4M) has a higher market cap than LBCMF($3.67M). LMEFF YTD gains are higher at: 3.343 vs. LBCMF (-30.502). LMEFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.94M vs. LBCMF (-12.87M). LMEFF has more cash in the bank: 7.44M vs. LBCMF (984K). LMEFF has less debt than LBCMF: LMEFF (24K) vs LBCMF (295K). LBCMF (0) and LMEFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LBCMFLMEFFLBCMF / LMEFF
Capitalization3.67M83.4M4%
EBITDA-12.87M-3.94M326%
Gain YTD-30.5023.343-913%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash984K7.44M13%
Total Debt295K24K1,229%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LBCMF vs LMEFF: Fundamental Ratings
LBCMF
LMEFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4596
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LBCMF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LMEFF (67). This means that LBCMF’s stock grew similarly to LMEFF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as LBCMF (100). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to LBCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as LBCMF (99). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to LBCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as LBCMF (63). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to LBCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LMEFF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LBCMF (100). This means that LMEFF’s stock grew similarly to LBCMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBCMFLMEFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LBCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LMEFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAMRX28.830.15
+0.52%
Fidelity Asset Manager 85%
CGAEX11.940.06
+0.51%
Calvert Global Energy Solutions A
PQUAX12.220.04
+0.33%
PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity A
SMLPX10.50-0.01
-0.10%
Westwood Salient MLP & Engy Infras Inst
GAMPX13.90-0.03
-0.19%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd P

LBCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LBCMF and ZCTSF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBCMF and ZCTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LBCMF
1D Price
Change %
LBCMF100%
-1.18%
ZCTSF - LBCMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - LBCMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
KNTNF - LBCMF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
KOREF - LBCMF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
LMEFF - LBCMF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

LMEFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LMEFF and LBCMF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LMEFF and LBCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMEFF
1D Price
Change %
LMEFF100%
-0.34%
LBCMF - LMEFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
KTGDF - LMEFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
KNTNF - LMEFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.67%
KOREF - LMEFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
KSKGF - LMEFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More