LB
Price
$76.06
Change
+$2.95 (+4.04%)
Updated
Nov 14, 12:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.85B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NGS
Price
$29.58
Change
-$0.12 (-0.40%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
371.79M
144 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LB vs NGS

Header iconLB vs NGS Comparison
Open Charts LB vs NGSBanner chart's image
LandBridge
Price$76.06
Change+$2.95 (+4.04%)
Volume$600
Capitalization1.85B
Natural Gas Services Group
Price$29.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.40%)
Volume$63.73K
Capitalization371.79M
LB vs NGS Comparison Chart in %
LB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LB vs. NGS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LB is a Hold and NGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LB: $73.11 vs. NGS: $29.58)
Brand notoriety: LB and NGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LB: 181% vs. NGS: 109%
Market capitalization -- LB: $1.85B vs. NGS: $371.79M
LB [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $1.85B. NGS’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $371.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LB is a better buy in the long-term than NGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NGS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NGS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LB and NGS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +10.39% price change this week, while NGS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +2.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

NGS is expected to report earnings on Apr 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-0.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LB($1.85B) has a higher market cap than NGS($372M). LB has higher P/E ratio than NGS: LB (82.85) vs NGS (20.12). LB YTD gains are higher at: 13.717 vs. NGS (11.283). LB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 84.2M vs. NGS (69.3M). LB has more cash in the bank: 20.3M vs. NGS (325K). NGS has less debt than LB: NGS (182M) vs LB (371M). NGS (164M) and LB (156M) have equivalent revenues.
LBNGSLB / NGS
Capitalization1.85B372M498%
EBITDA84.2M69.3M122%
Gain YTD13.71711.283122%
P/E Ratio82.8520.12412%
Revenue156M164M95%
Total Cash20.3M325K6,246%
Total Debt371M182M204%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NGS: Fundamental Ratings
NGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LBNGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACGBY20.420.40
+1.98%
Agricultural Bank of China
POTMF1.90N/A
N/A
Portmeirion Group PLC
SLAMF11.90N/A
N/A
Slam Corp.
BKKPF4.55N/A
N/A
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.
HUPHY4.85N/A
N/A
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust

LB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LB has been loosely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LB jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LB
1D Price
Change %
LB100%
-10.31%
AROC - LB
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.16%
BKR - LB
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
NGS - LB
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
FTI - LB
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
RES - LB
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
More

NGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGS has been loosely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NGS jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGS
1D Price
Change %
NGS100%
+5.36%
AROC - NGS
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
KGS - NGS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
BKR - NGS
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.90%
OII - NGS
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
WFRD - NGS
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.83%
More