LAZ
Price
$53.48
Change
+$2.40 (+4.70%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.83B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWP
Price
$18.43
Change
+$0.81 (+4.60%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAZ vs PWP

Header iconLAZ vs PWP Comparison
Open Charts LAZ vs PWPBanner chart's image
Lazard
Price$53.48
Change+$2.40 (+4.70%)
Volume$7.66K
Capitalization4.83B
Perella Weinberg Partners
Price$18.43
Change+$0.81 (+4.60%)
Volume$21.63K
Capitalization1.19B
LAZ vs PWP Comparison Chart in %
LAZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAZ vs. PWP commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a StrongBuy and PWP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LAZ: $51.09 vs. PWP: $17.62)
Brand notoriety: LAZ and PWP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAZ: 44% vs. PWP: 18%
Market capitalization -- LAZ: $4.83B vs. PWP: $1.19B
LAZ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.83B. PWP’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PWP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAZ is a better buy in the long-term than PWP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWP is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while PWP (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

PWP is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.75% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAZ($4.83B) has a higher market cap than PWP($1.19B). PWP has higher P/E ratio than LAZ: PWP (23.54) vs LAZ (20.18). LAZ YTD gains are higher at: 3.489 vs. PWP (-25.371). LAZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 471M vs. PWP (98.1M). PWP has less debt than LAZ: PWP (185M) vs LAZ (2.2B). LAZ has higher revenues than PWP: LAZ (3.05B) vs PWP (871M).
LAZPWPLAZ / PWP
Capitalization4.83B1.19B404%
EBITDA471M98.1M480%
Gain YTD3.489-25.371-14%
P/E Ratio20.1823.5486%
Revenue3.05B871M351%
Total CashN/A145M-
Total Debt2.2B185M1,188%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAZPWP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSVRX43.56N/A
N/A
Harbor Small Cap Value Admin
JAGCX59.14N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Glb Tech and Innovt C
TLOFX9.92N/A
N/A
Transamerica Large Value Opps R4
FNGDX16.29N/A
N/A
Franklin Intl Growth C
CFMVX24.75N/A
N/A
Commerce MidCap Value

LAZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAZ has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAZ jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAZ
1D Price
Change %
LAZ100%
+0.45%
MC - LAZ
83%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
PIPR - LAZ
82%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
SF - LAZ
82%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
GS - LAZ
80%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
MS - LAZ
80%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More

PWP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWP has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWP jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWP
1D Price
Change %
PWP100%
-1.62%
PIPR - PWP
82%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
EVR - PWP
81%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
MC - PWP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
LAZ - PWP
74%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
JEF - PWP
74%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
More