LAZ
Price
$52.04
Change
+$1.55 (+3.07%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
38 days until earnings call
PJT
Price
$155.41
Change
+$2.55 (+1.67%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LAZ vs PJT

Header iconLAZ vs PJT Comparison
Open Charts LAZ vs PJTBanner chart's image
Lazard
Price$52.04
Change+$1.55 (+3.07%)
Volume$2.51M
CapitalizationN/A
PJT Partners
Price$155.41
Change+$2.55 (+1.67%)
Volume$515.92K
CapitalizationN/A
LAZ vs PJT Comparison Chart
Loading...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PJT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAZ vs. PJT commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a Hold and PJT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (LAZ: $52.04 vs. PJT: $155.41)
Brand notoriety: LAZ and PJT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAZ: 289% vs. PJT: 220%
Market capitalization -- LAZ: $3.66B vs. PJT: $2.27B
LAZ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.66B. PJT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePJT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PJT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PJT is a better buy in the long-term than LAZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PJT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PJT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PJT is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.81% price change this week, while PJT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

PJT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.65% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAZ($3.66B) has a higher market cap than PJT($2.27B). PJT has higher P/E ratio than LAZ: PJT (30.47) vs LAZ (16.44). LAZ (56.516) and PJT (53.851) have similar YTD gains . PJT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 245M vs. LAZ (40.9M). LAZ has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. PJT (356M). PJT has less debt than LAZ: PJT (331M) vs LAZ (2.18B). LAZ has higher revenues than PJT: LAZ (2.55B) vs PJT (1.15B).
LAZPJTLAZ / PJT
Capitalization3.66B2.27B161%
EBITDA40.9M245M17%
Gain YTD56.51653.851105%
P/E Ratio16.4430.4754%
Revenue2.55B1.15B221%
Total Cash1.19B356M335%
Total Debt2.18B331M657%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ vs PJT: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
PJT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7228
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
274
SMR RATING
1..100
1917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8928
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAZ's Valuation (69) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PJT (72). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to PJT’s over the last 12 months.

PJT's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (27). This means that PJT’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

PJT's SMR Rating (17) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (19). This means that PJT’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

PJT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (42). This means that PJT’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

PJT's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAZ (89). This means that PJT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAZPJT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PJT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

LAZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAZ has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAZ jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAZ
1D Price
Change %
LAZ100%
+3.07%
MC - LAZ
75%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
EVR - LAZ
73%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
PIPR - LAZ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
PJT - LAZ
68%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
SF - LAZ
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
More

PJT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PJT has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PJT jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PJT
1D Price
Change %
PJT100%
+1.67%
PIPR - PJT
77%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
HLI - PJT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
MC - PJT
76%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
EVR - PJT
74%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
SF - PJT
68%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
More