LAZ
Price
$52.04
Change
+$1.55 (+3.07%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
38 days until earnings call
PIPR
Price
$297.75
Change
+$5.12 (+1.75%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LAZ vs PIPR

Header iconLAZ vs PIPR Comparison
Open Charts LAZ vs PIPRBanner chart's image
Lazard
Price$52.04
Change+$1.55 (+3.07%)
Volume$2.51M
CapitalizationN/A
Piper Sandler Companies
Price$297.75
Change+$5.12 (+1.75%)
Volume$338.84K
CapitalizationN/A
LAZ vs PIPR Comparison Chart
Loading...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAZ vs. PIPR commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a Hold and PIPR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (LAZ: $52.04 vs. PIPR: $297.75)
Brand notoriety: LAZ and PIPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAZ: 289% vs. PIPR: 306%
Market capitalization -- LAZ: $3.66B vs. PIPR: $2.98B
LAZ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.66B. PIPR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIPR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIPR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the long-term than LAZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIPR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PIPR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIPR is a better buy in the short-term than LAZ.

Price Growth

LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.81% price change this week, while PIPR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -6.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

PIPR is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.65% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAZ($3.66B) has a higher market cap than PIPR($2.98B). PIPR has higher P/E ratio than LAZ: PIPR (39.76) vs LAZ (16.44). PIPR YTD gains are higher at: 72.964 vs. LAZ (56.516). PIPR has less debt than LAZ: PIPR (164M) vs LAZ (2.18B). LAZ has higher revenues than PIPR: LAZ (2.55B) vs PIPR (1.3B).
LAZPIPRLAZ / PIPR
Capitalization3.66B2.98B123%
EBITDA40.9MN/A-
Gain YTD56.51672.96477%
P/E Ratio16.4439.7641%
Revenue2.55B1.3B196%
Total Cash1.19BN/A-
Total Debt2.18B164M1,326%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ vs PIPR: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
PIPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7269
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
276
SMR RATING
1..100
1966
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8985
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIPR's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAZ (69) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as LAZ (27) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's SMR Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIPR (66) in the null industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as PIPR (42) in the null industry. This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to PIPR’s over the last 12 months.

PIPR's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as LAZ (89) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that PIPR’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAZPIPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LAZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

LAZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAZ has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAZ jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAZ
1D Price
Change %
LAZ100%
+3.07%
MC - LAZ
75%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
EVR - LAZ
73%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
PIPR - LAZ
70%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
PJT - LAZ
68%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
SF - LAZ
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
More

PIPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIPR has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PIPR jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIPR
1D Price
Change %
PIPR100%
+1.75%
EVR - PIPR
83%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
MC - PIPR
80%
Closely correlated
+2.91%
SF - PIPR
78%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
PJT - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
HLI - PIPR
77%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More