LAZ
Price
$50.08
Change
-$1.83 (-3.53%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.75B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMR
Price
$7.32
Change
-$0.04 (-0.54%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
21.96B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAZ vs NMR

Header iconLAZ vs NMR Comparison
Open Charts LAZ vs NMRBanner chart's image
Lazard
Price$50.08
Change-$1.83 (-3.53%)
Volume$516.58K
Capitalization4.75B
Nomura Holdings
Price$7.32
Change-$0.04 (-0.54%)
Volume$573.7K
Capitalization21.96B
LAZ vs NMR Comparison Chart in %
LAZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAZ vs. NMR commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAZ is a StrongBuy and NMR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LAZ: $51.91 vs. NMR: $7.36)
Brand notoriety: LAZ and NMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAZ: 113% vs. NMR: 68%
Market capitalization -- LAZ: $4.75B vs. NMR: $21.96B
LAZ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.75B. NMR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $21.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LAZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NMR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LAZ and NMR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAZ is a better buy in the short-term than NMR.

Price Growth

LAZ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +4.59% price change this week, while NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

NMR is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.19% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($22B) has a higher market cap than LAZ($4.75B). LAZ has higher P/E ratio than NMR: LAZ (19.87) vs NMR (9.32). NMR YTD gains are higher at: 27.116 vs. LAZ (5.150). LAZ has less debt than NMR: LAZ (2.2B) vs NMR (15.59T). NMR has higher revenues than LAZ: NMR (1.73T) vs LAZ (3.05B).
LAZNMRLAZ / NMR
Capitalization4.75B22B22%
EBITDA471MN/A-
Gain YTD5.15027.11619%
P/E Ratio19.879.32213%
Revenue3.05B1.73T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.2B15.59T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAZ vs NMR: Fundamental Ratings
LAZ
NMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2120
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4849
SMR RATING
1..100
251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (15) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (21). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NMR (49). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (1) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (25). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LAZ (52). This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to LAZ’s over the last 12 months.

LAZ's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NMR (52). This means that LAZ’s stock grew similarly to NMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LAZNMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STNC33.320.34
+1.04%
Hennessy Sustainable ETF
GVUS53.430.55
+1.04%
Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF
PXF64.150.50
+0.79%
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF
RSDE21.560.12
+0.55%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Eql Wght Buffr ETF - Dec
EVNT11.970.02
+0.17%
AltShares Event-Driven ETF

LAZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAZ has been closely correlated with MC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAZ jumps, then MC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAZ
1D Price
Change %
LAZ100%
+1.05%
MC - LAZ
85%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
SF - LAZ
83%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
PIPR - LAZ
83%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
GS - LAZ
80%
Closely correlated
+3.54%
MS - LAZ
80%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
More

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then GS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
+2.22%
GS - NMR
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
DSEEY - NMR
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.09%
MS - NMR
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
SF - NMR
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
LAZ - NMR
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More