Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFEX
LAVVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$17.63
Change-$0.21 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAVVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVVX (2.13B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAVVX (0.94). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVVX (0.63) and RMFEX (0.62) have similar cost to investors . LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. LAVVX (4.75). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.30 vs. LAVVX (52.48).
| LAVVX | RMFEX | LAVVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.62 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.779 | 15.396 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.46 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 7.02 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.52 | 31.78 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.48 | 57.30 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.44 | 101.84 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement