Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMFCX
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$16.62
Change+$0.17 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAVVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVVX (2.13B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMFCX (1.18) vs LAVVX (0.00). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVVX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.30 vs. RMFCX (5.51). LAVVX (53.01) and RMFCX (52.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVVX | RMFCX | LAVVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.755 | 14.983 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 5.51 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.79 | 27.11 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.01 | 52.85 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.61 | 89.59 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement