Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVVX vs RMEBX
LAVVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R6
Price$17.21
Change-$0.10 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LAVVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVVX (2.2B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVVX: RMEBX (1.08) vs LAVVX (0.71). LAVVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVVX (11 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAVVX (0.63). LAVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. LAVVX (6.63). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. LAVVX (40.28).
| LAVVX | RMEBX | LAVVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.054 | 2.231 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.08 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 7.30 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.87 | 28.21 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.28 | 43.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.41 | 103.95 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement