Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVSX vs RMFCX
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R4
Price$16.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LAVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVSX (2.18B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVSX: RMFCX (1.26) vs LAVSX (0.51). LAVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVSX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAVSX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. LAVSX (9.68). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.52 vs. LAVSX (36.03).
| LAVSX | RMFCX | LAVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.035 | 2.040 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.26 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.68 | 11.89 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.65 | 27.98 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.03 | 43.52 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.30 | 109.76 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement