Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFEX
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$16.36
Change-$0.12 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.55
Change-$1.72 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVRX (2.19B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFEX (1.50) vs LAVRX (0.27). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.80 vs. LAVRX (6.16). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. LAVRX (35.90).
| LAVRX | RMFEX | LAVRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.958 | 2.280 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.50 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 7.80 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.30 | 29.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.90 | 46.45 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.53 | 114.19 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement