Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFEX
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$15.82
Change+$0.16 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.90
Change+$0.30 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAVRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVRX (2.13B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFEX (1.43) vs LAVRX (0.00). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.73 vs. RMFEX (5.83). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.19 vs. LAVRX (48.33).
| LAVRX | RMFEX | LAVRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.62 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.191 | 15.285 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.73 | 5.83 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.11 | 28.26 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.33 | 55.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.33 | 97.17 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement