Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMFCX
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$16.77
Change-$0.19 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAVRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVRX (2.13B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LAVRX (0.54). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. LAVRX (5.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. LAVRX (50.06).
| LAVRX | RMFCX | LAVRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.91 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.531 | 15.093 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.21 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.03 | 6.67 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.58 | 30.56 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.06 | 54.90 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.06 | 94.04 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement