Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVRX vs RMEBX
LAVRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVRX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R3
Price$16.36
Change-$0.12 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LAVRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVRX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVRX (2.19B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVRX: RMEBX (1.08) vs LAVRX (0.27). LAVRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVRX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAVRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAVRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LAVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. LAVRX (6.16). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. LAVRX (35.90).
| LAVRX | RMEBX | LAVRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.07 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.07 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.958 | 2.231 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.08 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.16 | 7.30 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.30 | 28.21 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.90 | 43.15 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.53 | 103.95 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement