Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVQX vs RMFCX
LAVQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R2
Price$15.76
Change+$0.16 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAVQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVQX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVQX (2.13B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVQX: RMFCX (1.18) vs LAVQX (0.00). LAVQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAVQX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. RMFCX (5.51). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. LAVQX (47.46).
| LAVQX | RMFCX | LAVQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.91 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.91 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.058 | 14.983 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.58 | 5.51 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.53 | 27.11 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.46 | 52.85 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.83 | 89.59 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement