Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVQX vs RMFCX
LAVQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R2
Price$16.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAVQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVQX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVQX (2.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVQX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAVQX (0.49). LAVQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVQX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. LAVQX (4.02). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. LAVQX (52.69).
| LAVQX | RMFCX | LAVQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.91 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.91 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.841 | 13.689 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.20 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | 4.96 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 38.79 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.69 | 57.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.82 | 91.18 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement