Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.74
Change-$0.20 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVPX (2.13B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.84 vs. LAVPX (3.90). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.52 vs. LAVPX (48.33).
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.188 | 14.089 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.46 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | 5.84 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.32 | 31.20 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.33 | 55.52 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.84 | 96.76 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement