Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVPX (2.07B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. LAVPX (4.23). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. LAVPX (53.54).
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.937 | 13.941 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.46 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.23 | 5.28 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.55 | 40.09 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.54 | 59.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.40 | 98.84 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement