Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFEX
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAVPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVPX (2.17B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFEX (1.43) vs LAVPX (0.00). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX (8.21) and LAVPX (8.00) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. LAVPX (40.24).
| LAVPX | RMFEX | LAVPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.62 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.550 | 9.983 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 8.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.37 | 29.84 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.24 | 48.39 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.67 | 97.98 | 46% |