Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.33
Change-$0.12 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVPX (2.2B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAVPX (0.31). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. LAVPX (6.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. LAVPX (36.08).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.963 | 2.244 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 1.24 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 7.45 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 28.73 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.08 | 44.16 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.03 | 105.79 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement