Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVPX (2.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. LAVPX (4.23). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. LAVPX (53.54).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.937 | 13.689 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.23 | 4.96 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.55 | 38.79 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.54 | 57.10 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.40 | 91.18 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement