Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMFCX
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAVPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVPX (2.17B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMFCX (1.18) vs LAVPX (0.00). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAVPX (8.00) and RMFCX (7.94) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. LAVPX (40.24).
| LAVPX | RMFCX | LAVPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.550 | 9.715 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 7.94 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.37 | 28.72 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.24 | 46.19 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.67 | 90.34 | 49% |