Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVPX vs RMEBX
LAVPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVPX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
Price$16.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAVPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVPX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAVPX (2.07B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVPX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LAVPX (0.57). LAVPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVPX (24 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAVPX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAVPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAVPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. LAVPX (4.23). RMEBX (55.95) and LAVPX (53.54) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAVPX | RMEBX | LAVPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.07 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.937 | 13.527 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.23 | 4.81 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.55 | 38.19 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.54 | 55.95 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.40 | 89.36 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement