Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMFEX
LAVFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.78
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LAVFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAVFX (2.07B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFEX (1.49) vs LAVFX (0.91). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAVFX (0.80) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.06 vs. RMFEX (8.06). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. LAVFX (55.53).
| LAVFX | RMFEX | LAVFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.62 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.661 | 11.638 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.49 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.06 | 8.06 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.40 | 33.39 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.53 | 58.84 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.31 | 98.59 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement