Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMFCX
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$15.98
Change+$0.17 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAVFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVFX (2.13B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMFCX (1.18) vs LAVFX (0.00). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAVFX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. LAVFX (2.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. LAVFX (38.90).
| LAVFX | RMFCX | LAVFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.827 | 15.500 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.90 | 6.27 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.23 | 27.68 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.90 | 52.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.72 | 90.44 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers