Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAVFX vs RMEBX
LAVFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAVFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
Price$16.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.63
Change+$0.22 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LAVFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAVFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAVFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAVFX (2.18B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAVFX: RMEBX (1.10) vs LAVFX (0.67). LAVFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAVFX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAVFX (0.80). LAVFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAVFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.40 vs. LAVFX (7.93). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.71 vs. LAVFX (38.06).
| LAVFX | RMEBX | LAVFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.07 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.555 | 2.467 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.10 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.93 | 10.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.45 | 27.99 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.06 | 43.71 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.64 | 108.89 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement