Advertisement
LAUR vs LINC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAUR is a Hold and LINC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LAUR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLINC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LAUR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LINC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LAUR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LINC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LAUR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LINC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LAUR (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while LINC (@Other Consumer Specialties) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -2.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
LAUR is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
LINC is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-2.63% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
| LAUR | LINC | LAUR / LINC | |
| Capitalization | 4.99B | 841M | 593% |
| EBITDA | 473M | 39.6M | 1,194% |
| Gain YTD | 0.564 | 10.021 | 6% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.08 | 59.07 | 42% |
| Revenue | 1.58B | 495M | 320% |
| Total Cash | 241M | 13.5M | 1,785% |
| Total Debt | 438M | 196M | 223% |
LAUR | LINC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LAUR's Valuation (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (90). This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LAUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (12). This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LAUR's SMR Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (76). This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
LINC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LAUR (42). This means that LINC’s stock grew similarly to LAUR’s over the last 12 months.
LAUR's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LINC (40). This means that LAUR’s stock grew similarly to LINC’s over the last 12 months.
| LAUR | LINC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACSMX | 11.23 | 0.13 | +1.17% |
| Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap | |||
| CSPEX | 71.82 | 0.08 | +0.11% |
| American Funds SMALLCAP World 529E | |||
| FIVOX | 15.11 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor International Value C | |||
| REGRX | 23.04 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Russell Inv Emerging Markets R6 | |||
| HSRUX | 27.77 | -0.29 | -1.03% |
| Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth R6 | |||
LAUR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAUR has been loosely correlated with LOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAUR jumps, then LOPE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAUR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAUR | 100% | -1.80% | ||
| LOPE - LAUR | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| LINC - LAUR | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| GHC - LAUR | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| BCO - LAUR | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| AZZ - LAUR | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||
LINC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LINC has been closely correlated with UTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LINC jumps, then UTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LINC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LINC | 100% | -1.30% | ||
| UTI - LINC | 68% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| PRDO - LINC | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| APEI - LINC | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| ATGE - LINC | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| AZZ - LINC | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More | ||||