Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LASGX vs RERBX
LASGX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts LASGX vs RERBX
Lord Abbett International Growth R4
Price$16.54
Change+$0.30 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$58.87
Change+$0.40 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
LASGX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. LASGX (3.69M). RERBX pays higher dividends than LASGX: RERBX (0.25) vs LASGX (0.19). LASGX was incepted earlier than RERBX: LASGX (4 years) vs RERBX (23 years). LASGX (9.37) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). LASGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). LASGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: LASGX (0) vs RERBX (250). LASGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.70 vs. RERBX (7.49).
| LASGX | RERBX | LASGX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.56 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 9.37 | 1.56 | 601% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.895 | 14.985 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.25 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.70 | 7.49 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.09 | 32.33 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 7.43 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.45 | - |