LAR
Price
$4.35
Change
+$0.16 (+3.82%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
683.4M
120 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LZM
Price
$3.98
Change
+$0.07 (+1.79%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
310.35M
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAR vs LZM

Header iconLAR vs LZM Comparison
Open Charts LAR vs LZMBanner chart's image
Lithium Argentina AG
Price$4.35
Change+$0.16 (+3.82%)
Volume$15.15K
Capitalization683.4M
Lifezone Metals
Price$3.98
Change+$0.07 (+1.79%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization310.35M
LAR vs LZM Comparison Chart in %
LAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAR vs. LZM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAR is a Hold and LZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LAR: $4.19 vs. LZM: $3.91)
Brand notoriety: LAR and LZM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAR: 68% vs. LZM: 90%
Market capitalization -- LAR: $708.05M vs. LZM: $333.46M
LAR [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $708.05M. LZM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $333.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAR is a better buy in the long-term than LZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LZM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LZM is a better buy in the short-term than LAR.

Price Growth

LAR (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +12.33% price change this week, while LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAR is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2026.

LZM is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAR($683M) has a higher market cap than LZM($310M). LAR YTD gains are higher at: 59.924 vs. LZM (-43.741). LAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.3M vs. LZM (-23.21M). LAR has more cash in the bank: 68M vs. LZM (12.5M). LZM has less debt than LAR: LZM (31.4M) vs LAR (221M). LZM has higher revenues than LAR: LZM (416K) vs LAR (0).
LARLZMLAR / LZM
Capitalization683M310M220%
EBITDA10.3M-23.21M-44%
Gain YTD59.924-43.741-137%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0416K-
Total Cash68M12.5M544%
Total Debt221M31.4M704%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAR: Fundamental Ratings
LAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LARLZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGIFX92.770.29
+0.31%
JPMorgan US Value R5
MFCCX39.570.11
+0.28%
Meridian Contrarian C
GEMLX14.860.04
+0.27%
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn C
TVOYX41.230.02
+0.05%
Touchstone Small Cap Value Y
FIMVX29.30N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index

LAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAR has been loosely correlated with SGML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAR jumps, then SGML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAR
1D Price
Change %
LAR100%
+2.95%
SGML - LAR
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
LAC - LAR
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
SLI - LAR
44%
Loosely correlated
+5.64%
BHP - LAR
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
RIO - LAR
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
More

LZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with SGML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then SGML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZM
1D Price
Change %
LZM100%
-2.74%
SGML - LZM
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
RIO - LZM
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
LAR - LZM
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.95%
BHP - LZM
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
SLI - LZM
32%
Poorly correlated
+5.64%
More