LAR
Price
$5.24
Change
+$0.04 (+0.77%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
841.39M
99 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LITM
Price
$3.58
Change
+$0.21 (+6.23%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
60.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAR vs LITM

Header iconLAR vs LITM Comparison
Open Charts LAR vs LITMBanner chart's image
Lithium Argentina AG
Price$5.24
Change+$0.04 (+0.77%)
Volume$17.28K
Capitalization841.39M
Snow Lake Resources
Price$3.58
Change+$0.21 (+6.23%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization60.75M
LAR vs LITM Comparison Chart in %
LAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LITM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAR vs. LITM commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAR is a StrongBuy and LITM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (LAR: $5.20 vs. LITM: $3.37)
Brand notoriety: LAR and LITM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAR: 48% vs. LITM: 17%
Market capitalization -- LAR: $841.39M vs. LITM: $60.75M
LAR [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $841.39M. LITM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $60.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLITM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LITM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAR is a better buy in the long-term than LITM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LITM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LITM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LITM is a better buy in the short-term than LAR.

Price Growth

LAR (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.11% price change this week, while LITM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +7.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +240.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAR is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+7.28% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAR($841M) has a higher market cap than LITM($60.7M). LAR YTD gains are higher at: 98.473 vs. LITM (-72.997). LAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.3M vs. LITM (-6.85M). LAR (0) and LITM (0) have equivalent revenues.
LARLITMLAR / LITM
Capitalization841M60.7M1,386%
EBITDA10.3M-6.85M-150%
Gain YTD98.473-72.997-135%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash68MN/A-
Total Debt221MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAR: Fundamental Ratings
LAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LARLITM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LITM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRISX48.780.73
+1.52%
T. Rowe Price Financial Services
RYDAX113.340.96
+0.85%
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® A
SGARX24.880.10
+0.40%
Virtus SGA Global Growth R6
IPOYX23.27N/A
N/A
Nomura Systematic Emerging Markets Eq Y
FUFRX26.19-0.01
-0.04%
Franklin Utilities R6

LAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAR has been loosely correlated with SGML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAR jumps, then SGML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAR
1D Price
Change %
LAR100%
-2.62%
SGML - LAR
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.75%
LAC - LAR
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
SLI - LAR
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
ATLX - LAR
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.45%
BHP - LAR
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
More

LITM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LITM and NMG have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LITM and NMG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LITM
1D Price
Change %
LITM100%
+2.43%
NMG - LITM
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.46%
LAR - LITM
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
BLTH - LITM
27%
Poorly correlated
-13.35%
CASXF - LITM
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSM - LITM
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.24%
More