Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAPCX vs PDBZX
LAPCX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts LAPCX vs PDBZX
Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond C
Price$12.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.96B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$11.92
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.02B
LAPCX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAPCX vs. PDBZX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAPCX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 49B vs. LAPCX (3.96B). PDBZX (4.60) and LAPCX (4.48) have matching dividends . LAPCX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: LAPCX (10 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). LAPCX (1.28) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). LAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 377.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAPCX: PDBZX (0) vs LAPCX (1500). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.12 vs. LAPCX (4.50). LAPCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.48 vs. PDBZX (-1.62).
| LAPCX | PDBZX | LAPCX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.49 | 261% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.50 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.663 | 3.294 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.96B | 49B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.48 | 4.60 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 5.12 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.35 | 10.88 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.48 | -1.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers