Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAPCX vs PDBZX
LAPCX vs PDBZX Comparison
Open Charts LAPCX vs PDBZX
Lord Abbett Core Plus Bond C
Price$13.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.18B
PGIM Total Return Bond Z
Price$12.20
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.26B
LAPCX vs PDBZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAPCX vs. PDBZX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAPCX is a Hold and PDBZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBZX has more cash in the bank: 51.3B vs. LAPCX (4.18B). PDBZX (4.60) and LAPCX (4.41) have matching dividends . LAPCX was incepted earlier than PDBZX: LAPCX (10 years) vs PDBZX (29 years). LAPCX (1.28) is less costly to investors than PDBZX (0.50). LAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 377.00 vs. PDBZX (113.00). PDBZX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAPCX: PDBZX (0) vs LAPCX (1500). PDBZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.08 vs. LAPCX (3.35). PDBZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.19 vs. LAPCX (-0.29).
| LAPCX | PDBZX | LAPCX / PDBZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.49 | 261% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.50 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.765 | 6.635 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.18B | 51.3B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 4.60 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.35 | 4.08 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.96 | 14.65 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.29 | 0.19 | -149% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers