LANV
Price
$2.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25, 03:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
247.92M
WOSGF
Price
$4.84
Change
+$0.10 (+2.11%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LANV vs WOSGF

Header iconLANV vs WOSGF Comparison
Open Charts LANV vs WOSGFBanner chart's image
Lanvin Group Holdings
Price$2.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.34K
Capitalization247.92M
Watches of Switzerland Group
Price$4.84
Change+$0.10 (+2.11%)
Volume$6.25K
Capitalization1.11B
LANV vs WOSGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LANV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WOSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LANV vs. WOSGF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANV is a Buy and WOSGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LANV: $2.12 vs. WOSGF: $4.84)
Brand notoriety: LANV and WOSGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LANV: 68% vs. WOSGF: 72%
Market capitalization -- LANV: $247.92M vs. WOSGF: $1.11B
LANV [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $247.92M. WOSGF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $1.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $306.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $41.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LANV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWOSGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LANV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WOSGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LANV and WOSGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LANV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOSGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LANV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WOSGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WOSGF is a better buy in the short-term than LANV.

Price Growth

LANV (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а +5.47% price change this week, while WOSGF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -4.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (-1.45% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WOSGF($1.11B) has a higher market cap than LANV($248M). LANV YTD gains are higher at: 5.473 vs. WOSGF (-29.446). WOSGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 203M vs. LANV (-122.6M). WOSGF has more cash in the bank: 110M vs. LANV (29.7M). LANV has less debt than WOSGF: LANV (441M) vs WOSGF (683M). WOSGF has higher revenues than LANV: WOSGF (1.56B) vs LANV (291M).
LANVWOSGFLANV / WOSGF
Capitalization248M1.11B22%
EBITDA-122.6M203M-60%
Gain YTD5.473-29.446-19%
P/E RatioN/A15.78-
Revenue291M1.56B19%
Total Cash29.7M110M27%
Total Debt441M683M65%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LANVWOSGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LANV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WOSGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGJTF70.041.15
+1.67%
Cargojet, Inc.
BBRYF16.10N/A
N/A
Burberry Group Plc
SWZCF741.11N/A
N/A
Swisscom AG
REVFF0.16N/A
N/A
REV Explorations Corp.
PXHI2.44-0.16
-6.15%
PhoneX Holdings, Inc.

LANV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LANV and BGI have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LANV and BGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANV
1D Price
Change %
LANV100%
+2.42%
BGI - LANV
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
CPRI - LANV
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
TPR - LANV
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
WOSGF - LANV
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIG - LANV
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
More

WOSGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WOSGF and PPRUY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WOSGF and PPRUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WOSGF
1D Price
Change %
WOSGF100%
N/A
PPRUY - WOSGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
SWGAY - WOSGF
17%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
SWGNF - WOSGF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFRGY - WOSGF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
PRDSY - WOSGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More